Why I Paid Rs. 345 on inDrive When Public Vehicles Stopped in Nepal
Public vehicles were off in Nepal, and I had to pay Rs. 345 on inDrive just to reach my office. Here's my real story and thoughts on ride-sharing fares.
The other day in Nepal, public vehicles were suddenly off the road. No buses, no micros, nothing. I was getting late for the office and had no option, so I opened the inDrive app to book a ride.
On a normal day, I pay around Rs. 130 to Rs. 150 for that trip.
But this time?
The app showed me a fare of Rs. 345!
I was shocked. That’s more than double the usual amount. But I had no choice — I had to reach the office. So I booked the ride and paid the full Rs. 345.
Later that evening, when I was heading home, I checked inDrive again. This time, the fare was around Rs. 161. Much better, right?
So What’s Going On?
It seems ride-sharing apps like inDrive increase their prices when public demand is high — like when buses and micros stop running. Because many people need a ride and there are fewer drivers available, prices shoot up.
This system is called "dynamic pricing", and it’s common in many countries.
But here’s the question: is this system fair for everyone?
Imagine someone who doesn't earn much — they might not be able to pay Rs. 345 just to get to work. Is it right to charge that much when people don’t have any other options?
My Thoughts
I think ride-sharing apps are useful. They help a lot, especially when public transport is not working. But I also believe there should be a limit on how high the price can go, especially during public emergencies or strikes.
People should not be forced to pay extra just because the system knows they’re desperate.
What About You?
Have you faced this kind of situation? Would you pay Rs. 345 just to reach your office? Let’s start a small conversation in the comments or messages.
I’d love to hear your story.
